Consideration of Retrospectivity in Judicial Commodity Expertise

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32631/v.2025.4.25

Keywords:

valuation date, retrospective valuation, forensic commodity expertise, economic and statistical (index) research method, archival research method, method taking into account currency exchange rates.

Abstract

Retrospective assessment is a study conducted on the basis of specialised knowledge in the field of commodity science, which involves determining a specific set of characteristics of an object sufficient to establish its market value on a specific date in the past. This is a labour-intensive process based on knowledge of general economic patterns, theoretical principles of commodity science and the practical skills of a commodity expert. Avoiding mistakes when conducting a forensic commodity expertise with a view to retrospectivity will help improve the quality of expert work, ensure proper interaction between experts and enterprises, institutions and organisations regardless of their form of ownership, and reduce the number of reports on the impossibility of conducting an expertise. This, in turn, will contribute to establishing the objective truth in court cases and increasing the effectiveness of independent assessment.

The article clarifies the peculiarities of taking into account retrospectivity when conducting a judicial commodity expertise, analyses the main difficulties that arise in practice when evaluating objects on a date other than the date of the study. A number of practical and effective tools for solving typical expert tasks are proposed, and the basic conditions, limitations and assumptions for performing retrospective property valuation are defined. The feasibility of using both direct and indirect research methods is justified. Practical recommendations are provided for forensic institutions on improving the effectiveness of retrospective studies, improving organisational procedures and the correctness of the expert's conclusion, which ensures its evidential value in court proceedings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • S. O. Diachuk, Kharkiv Scientific Research Expert-Criminalistic Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine

    Department of Commodity and Gemological Research (chief expert).

References

1. Kholodova, O. Yu., Hubareva, V. M., & Sych, H. A. (2020). Methodology for determining the cost of machines, equipment, raw materials and consumer goods taking into account retrospective of evaluation while forensic commodity examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 22(2), 513–526. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2.2020.41.

2. Bednarchuk, M. S., Dolynskyi, S. M., & Yarovyi, O. D. (2024, September 5). Features and problems of retrospective assessment in forensic commodity examination [Conference presentation abstract]. All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference “Modern trends in the development of forensic examination and criminalistics”, Odesa, Ukraine.

3. Berlinova, L. V., & Lysenko, N. V. (2021, September 30). Creation of digital databases of price information as a prospect for the development of forensic commodity examination [Conference presentation abstract]. I International scientific and practical conference “Modern commodity expertise: theoretical developments, practical experience, problems and prospects”, Lviv, Ukraine.

4. Pozdniakov, Yu. V., Lapishko, M. L., & Komarovskyi, A. A. (2023). Methodological principles for applying property value reindexation when performing a retrospective assessment. Grail of Science, 27, 81–96. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.12.05.2023.008.

5. Pavlenko, O. V., & Sorokina, V. O. (2021). Methodology for determining market and non-market types of value when conducting forensic commodity examinations. Kyiv.

Published

29-12-2025

Issue

Section

Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics; Forensic Examination; OSA

How to Cite

“Consideration of Retrospectivity in Judicial Commodity Expertise” (2025) Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 111(4), pp. 316–328. doi:10.32631/v.2025.4.25.