Pre-trial investigation in the de-occupied territories: normative regulation and prospects for implementation
Abstract
The state of normative regulation of the pre-trial investigation procedure was studied, as well as the prospects for its implementation after the de-occupation of Ukrainian territories were clarified. It was emphasized that the raised issue requires qualitative discussion by representatives of various institutions of criminal justice. It is important in this direction to build effective algorithms for pre-trial investigation bodies, the prosecutor’s office, the court, which cannot be implemented without the introduction of new legislative initiatives.
Based on the analysis of the state of normative and legal regulation, it was found that currently, at the level of current criminal procedural legislation, the issue of the fate of criminal proceedings after de-occupation has not been settled. The issue of the procedure for carrying out criminal proceedings in which materials are lost, in particular destroyed in the occupied territory, is also not defined. Currently, there are draft laws (in particular, prepared by the Office of the Prosecutor General and the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union), which can be taken into account when improving the legislation in this direction.
Currently, there are many questions regarding the procedure for conducting pre-trial investigations in the de-occupied territories. In particular, this is a question of evaluating the evidence obtained by the occupation authorities; terms in criminal proceedings that were initiated by national bodies of pre-trial investigation and were not completed at the time of occupation; restoration of lost materials of criminal proceedings. Special attention is paid to the issue of evaluation of the evidence obtained by the occupation authorities and arguments are given in favor of the position regarding the inadmissibility of such evidence. The necessity of standardizing the procedure for restoring (full or partial) lost materials of criminal proceedings (both materials of pre-trial investigation and materials of court proceedings) has been proven.
Downloads
References
Fomina, T. H. (2024, April 19). Trends and prospects of criminal proceedings after deoccupation [Conference presentation abstract]. International Scientific and Practical Conference “Crime and its countermeasures in the conditions of war and in the post-war perspective: an interdisciplinary panorama”, Vinnitsa, Ukraine.
Yakovenko, M. O. (2022, September 23). Some issues of resumption of activities of pre-trial investigation bodies in the de-occupied territories [Conference presentation abstract]. Round table “Criminal Justice of Ukraine: realities and prospects”, Lviv, Ukraine.
Sokurenko, V. V. (2022). Stabilization-transitive strategy for countering crime in the de-occupied territories of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine, 2(27), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.32631/vca.2022.2.01.
Kupriyanova, A. O. (2023). Ensuring the restoration of state functions in deoccupied territories of territorial communities by bodies and subdivisions of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. Scientific notes of Taurida National V. I. Vernadsky University. Series “Public Management and Administration”, 1(34), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.32782/TNU-2663-6468/2023.1.
Medianyk, I. S. (2023, March 17). Organizational and legal provision of the process of reintegration of temporarily occupied territories [Conference presentation abstract]. International Scientific and Practical Conference “International and national security: theoretical and applied aspects”, Dnipro, Ukraine. https://doi.org/10.31733/17-03-2023-269-270.
Buhaichuk, K. L. (2024). Stabilisation measures on the de-occupied territories: conceptual interpretation, classification, and application features. Law and Safety, 1(92), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2024.1.01.
Copyright (c) 2024 T. H. Fomina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.