Methodological fundamentals of scientific research of digitalization of state authority: theoretical and legal aspects
Abstract
The aim of the article is theoretical and legal coverage of key parameters of methodological tools in the scientific knowledge of digitalization of state power, which is proposed to be carried out on the basis of synthesis of achievements of general theoretical jurisprudence, branch legal sciences, and related social sciences. The structure of the methodology of research of digitalization of the state power which consists of seven "levels" located on the principle of hierarchy and subordination is offered: 1) the dominant world outlook; 2) philosophical principles; 3) type of scientific thinking (scientific rationality); 4) principles of scientific knowledge; 5) scientific paradigms; 6) methodological approaches; 7) scientific methods of cognition. A detailed description of each of the structural blocks of this methodology is given. It is substantiated that the dominant worldview necessary for the construction of the optimal methodology for understanding the phenomenon of digitalization of state power should include elements of modern non-classical (postclassical) philosophy, methodology of digital technology and constructivist elements of modern innovative methodology of general jurisprudence. It is proved that the post-classical type of rationality is optimal for understanding the processes of digitalization of state power. It was found that the leading general scientific paradigms of the study of digitalization of state power are the paradigms of information society and digitalization.
Downloads
References
Steblyna N.O., 2021. Digitization of public policy as a modern discourse [Tsyfrovizatsiia derzhavnoi polityky yak dyskurs suchasnosti]. D.Sc. dissertation. Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University.
Strutynska I.V., 2020. Digital transformation as an imperative of innovative development of business structures [Tsyfrova transformatsiia yak imperatyv innovatsiinoho rozvytku biznes-struktur]. D.Sc. dissertation. Zaporizhzhia National University.
Kerimov D.A., 2001. Methodology of law (subject, functions, problems of philosophy of law) [Metodologiya prava (predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava)]. Moscow: Avanta+.
Tykhomyrov D.O., 2021. Theoretical and legal principles of state policy in the field of civil security in Ukraine [Teoretyko-pravovi zasady derzhavnoi polityky u sferi tsyvilnoi bezpeky v Ukraini]. D.Sc. dissertation. National Academy of Internal Affairs.
Kartskhiya A.A., 2019. Civil law model of regulation of digital technologies [Grazhdansko-pravovaya model’ regulirovaniya tsifrovykh tekhnologii]. D.Sc. dissertation. Moscow.
Lukianets V.S., Kravchenko O.M., Ozadovska L.V. and Moroz O.Ya., 2010. Scientific worldview at the turn of the century [Naukovyi svitohliad na zlami stolit’]. Kyiv: Parapan.
Kelman M., 2015. Methodology of modern jurisprudence: becoming and main directions of development. Psychology & Society – Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo, No. 4, pp. 33-46.
Argamakova A.A., Maslanov E.V., Slyusarev V.V. and Khusyainov T.M. (eds), 2019. Social and Digital Science Research [Sotsial’nye i tsifrovye issledovaniya nauki]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Russkoe obshchestvo istorii i filosofii nauk”.
Bandura O.O., 2019. Anthropology of Law as a Component of Philosophical Anthropology (General Essay). Fìlosofs׳kì ta metodologìčnì problemi prava, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, pp. 8-15.
Mikheeva T.N., 2019. About the legal basis of digitalization in the Russian Federation [K voprosu o pravovykh osnovakh tsifrovizatsii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina, No. 9, pp. 114-122.
Bandura O.O., 2017. Praxiology of Law as the Constituent of Philosophy of Law. Fìlosofs׳kì ta metodologìčnì problemi prava, No. 2, pp. 11-23.
Dobronravova I.S., 2009. Ideals and types of rationality [Idealy i tipy ratsional’nosti]. In: Kiyashchenko L.P. and Stepin V.S. (eds). Post-nonclassical: philosophy, science, culture [Postneoklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul’tura]. St. Petersburg: Mir’. Pp. 296-314.
Stepin V.S., 2009. Classics, non-classics, post-non-classics: criteria for distinguishing [Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriterii razlicheniya]. In: Kiyashchenko L.P. and Stepin V.S. (eds). Post-nonclassical: philosophy, science, culture [Postneoklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul’tura]. St. Petersburg: Mir’. Pp. 249-295.
Stepin V., 2017. Typology of scientific rationality and synergy [Tipologiya nauchnoi ratsional’nosti i sinergetika]. Philosophy of Education – Fìlosofìâ osvìti, No. 1, pp. 6-29.
Kushakova-Kostytska N.V., 2019. Philosophical and legal principles of formation and development of the information society in Ukraine [Filosofsko-pravovi zasady stanovlennia i rozvytku informatsiinoho suspilstva v Ukraini]. D.Sc. dissertation. National Academy of Internal Affairs.
Voinikanis E.A., 2015. Paradigm approach to the study of intellectual rights [Paradigmal’nyiy podkhod k issledovaniyu intellektual’nykh prav]. D.Sc. dissertation. Moscow.
Kopytova O.S., 2021. Theoretical and legal principles of judicial law enforcement [Teoretyko-pravovi zasady sudovoho pravozastosuvannia]. D.Sc. dissertation. National Academy of Internal Affairs.
Miroshnychenko M.I., 2012. Genesis of the legal system of Ukraine: theoretical and methodological aspect [Henezys pravovoi systemy Ukrainy: teoretyko-metodolohichnyi aspekt]. Open International University of Human Development “Ukraine”.
Pustovit N.V., 2015. The nature of the axiosphere of the information society [Pryroda aksiosfery informatsiinoho suspilstva]. National Aerospace University named after M. Ye Zhukovsky “KhAI”.
Tykhomyrov O.D., 2017. Comparative approach in jurisprudence [Komparatyvnyi pidkhid u pravoznavstvi]. In: Honcharenko V.D. (ed.). Great Ukrainian legal encyclopedia [Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia]: in 20 vols. Vol. 2. Kharkiv: Pravo. Pp. 349-354.
Kresin O.V., 2017. Formation of theoretical foundations of comparative legal research in the second half of the XVIII – first third of the XIX century: comparative conceptualization [Stanovlennia teoretychnykh zasad porivnialno-pravovykh doslidzhen u druhii polovyni XVIII – pershii tretyni XIX stolittia: komparatyvna kontseptualizatsiia]. Kyiv: Lohos.
Fedorenko V.L., 2015. Methodology of modern constitutional and legal research in Ukraine [Metodolohiia suchasnykh konstytutsiino-pravovykh doslidzhen v Ukraini]. Kyiv: Lira-K.
Serdiuk O.V., 2007. Sociological approach in modern jurisprudence: knowledge of the sociality of law [Sotsiolohichnyi pidkhid u suchasnomu pravoznavstvi: piznannia sotsialnosti prava]. Kharkiv: Yashma.
Lepekh L.L., 2019. Social and legal efficiency of the mechanism of legal regulation [Sotsialna ta yurydychna efektyvnist mekhanizmu pravovoho rehuliuvannia]. Ph.D. dissertation. Lviv Polytechnic National University.
Vasileva E.G. and Kononenko D.V., 2016. Modern interpretations of the concept of electronic state (electronic government) [Sovremennye interpretatsii kontseptsii elektronnogo gosudarstva (elektronnogo pravitel’stva)]. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series: Jurisprudence – Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriâ: Ûrisprudenciâ, No. 1, pp. 9-16.
Savchyn M., 2019. Comparative constitutional law [Porivnialne konstytutsiine pravo]. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Chernysheva Yu.A., 2019. Human Rights in a Digitalized Society [Prava cheloveka v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii obshchestva]. Psychology and Law – Psihologiâ i parvo, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 90-102.
Gusarev S., 2011. Active approach is in the structure of methodology of modern jurisprudence [Diialnisnyi pidkhid u strukturi metodolohii suchasnoho pravoznavstva]. Pravo Ukraïni – Law of Ukraine, No. 8, pp. 160-166.
Balynska O. M., 2013. Semiotics of law as a philosophical and legal paradigm [Semiotyka prava yak filosofsko-pravova paradyhma]. Abstract of D.Sc. dissertation. Lviv State University of Internal Affairs.
Gavrilov O.A., 1980. Mathematical methods and models in socio-legal research [Matematicheskie metody i modeli v sotsial’no-pravovom issledovanii]. Moscow: Nauka.
Vasilev A.A. (ed.), 2020. Transforming Law in the Digital Age [Transformatsiya prava v tsifrovuyu epokhu]. Barnaul: Izdatel’stvo Altaiskogo universiteta.
Ponkin A.V. and Redkina A.I., 2018. Artificial intelligence in terms of law [Iskusstvennyi intellekt s tochki zreniya prava]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta družby narodov, No. 2, pp. 94-95.
Gribanov Yu.I., 2019. Digital transformation of socio-economic systems based on the development of the institution of service integration [Tsifrovaya transformatsiya sotsial’noekonomicheskikh sistem na osnove razvitiya instituta servisnoi integratsii]. D.Sc. dissertation. St. Petersburg.
Zaloilo M.V. and Pashentsev D.A., 2019. The national legal order of Russia in the context of digitalization [Natsional’nyi pravoporyadok Rossii v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, Vol. 10, Iss. 2, pp. 196-209.
Yaroshovets V.I., 2006. History of philosophy. Vocabulary [Istoriya filosofii. Slovnyk]. Kyiv: Znannia Ukrainy.
Balynska O.M. and Yashchenko V.A., 2019. Synergetics as a methodological paradigm of legal research [Synerhetyka yak metodolohichna paradyhma yurydychnykh doslidzhen]. Naukovij vìsnik Lʹvìvsʹkogo deržavnogo unìversitetu vnutrìšnìh sprav – Scientific Bulletin of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, No. 4, pp. 3-12.
Podzihun H.V., 2021. Public administration in the field of digital transformation [Publichne administruvannia u sferi tsyfrovoi transformatsii]. Ph.D. dissertation. Zaporizhzhia National University.
Pashchenko V.M., 2010. Methodology and research methods [Metodolohiia ta metody naukovykh doslidzhen]. Kyiv: Aspekt.
Copyright (c) 2021 E. Najafli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
