Prerequisites for the legal mechanisms development to combat disinformation in social media in the context of national security: problem statement

Keywords: disinformation, legal mechanism, social media, national security, freedom of speech.

Abstract

The article deals with the preconditions for the legal mechanisms development to combat disinformation in social media in the context of national security. The conclusion is formulated on the necessity of the development of such mechanisms on the basis of constitutional freedom of speech principle, with legislative definition of the exclusive possible restriction list in social media for the sake of national security.

It is noted that the difference between legal and corporate internal norms of regulation of social media companies directly affects the effectiveness of national interests’ protection both in the United States and Ukraine. Because the non-binding provisions of the First Amendment of the US Constitution for private entities determine the orientation of social media companies to make a profit, although the policy of Facebook and Google adheres to the principles of freedom of speech.

In the context of capacity building of the Centre for Countering Disinformation, counteracting disinformation campaigns for national security reasons requires a combination of efforts of the Centre with the national cybersecurity system, and with regulatory bodies of the media, strategic communications units of Ukraine Government in close cooperation with the private sector, primarily social media companies, and civil society.

It is concluded that compared to the US government, Ukrainian government has broader constitutional preconditions for the national security interests’ protection, particularly in connection with Russian Federation aggression. It is noted that regulations on combating disinformation in social networks should take into account international human rights requirements, national interests, as well as business processes of social media companies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

A. I. Marushchak, National Academy of the Security Service of Ukraine

Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor.

References

Preuss L., 1934. International Responsibility for Hostile Propaganda against Foreign States. American Journal of International Law, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 649-668.

Chander A., 2016. Internet Intermediaries as Platforms for Expression and Innovation. Global Commission on Internet Governance, [online] No. 42. Available at https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/documents/GCIG%20no.42.pdf [Accessed 7 December 2021].

Marwick A. and Lewis R. Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. [online] Data & Society. Available at https://datasociety.net/output/media-manipulation-and-disinfo-online/ [Accessed 7 December 2021].

Langvardt K., 2018. Regulating Online Content Moderation. Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 106, Iss. 5, pp. 1353-1388. Available at https://www.law.georgetown.edu/georgetown-law-journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2018/07/Regulating-Online-Content-Moderation.pdf [Accessed 7 December 2021].

Brennen B., 2017. Making Sense of Lies, Deceptive Propaganda, and Fake News. Journal of Media Ethics, [online] Vol. 32, No. 3. Available at https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1491&context=comm_fac [Accessed 7 December 2021].

Jankowicz N., 2017. The Only Way to Defend Against Russia’s Information War. [online] The New York Times. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/opinion/the-only-way-to-defend-against-russias-information-war.html [Accessed 7 December 2021].

Balkin J.M., 2009. The Future of Free Expression in a Digital Age. Pepperdine Law Review, [online] Vol. 36, Iss. 2. Available at https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol36/iss2/9 [Accessed 7 December 2021].

Hamilton R.J., 2020. Governing the Global Public Square. Harvard International Law Journal, [online] No. 17. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3426544 [Accessed 7 December 2021].

Ammori M., 2014. The “New” New York Times: Free Speech Lawyering in the Age of Google and Twitter. Harvard Law Review, [online] No. 2259. Available at https://harvardlawreview.org/2014/06/the-new-new-york-times-free-speech-lawyering-in-the-age-of-google-and-twitter/ [Accessed 7 December 2021].

Morphy E., 2006. Google, Brazil Lock Horns Over Social Networking Data. [online] TechNewsWorld. Available at http://www.technewsworld.com/story/privacy/52624.html [Accessed 7 December 2021].

Daskal J. Whose Law Governs in a Borderless World? [online] National Constitution Center. Available at https://constitutioncenter.org/digital-privacy/whose-law-governs-in-a-borderless-world [Accessed 7 December 2021].

Published
2021-12-24
How to Cite
Marushchak, A. I. (2021) “Prerequisites for the legal mechanisms development to combat disinformation in social media in the context of national security: problem statement”, Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 95(4), pp. 297-307. doi: 10.32631/v.2021.4.25.