Incentive Rules as an Institution of Civil Law of Ukraine
Abstract
It is noted that incentive rules, if assessed by the methodology of legal influence, are an autonomous institute of civil law. These rules are neither part of the system of rules on civil liability nor of the system of rules on enforcement of obligations. There is no correlation between the rules on civil liability and the rules on ensuring proper performance of obligations, as well as incentive rules, as between general and special provisions or between legal phenomena, some of which are a kind and others are, respectively, a variety of the former. The regulatory grouping that forms the civil law institution of incentives includes not only legislative incentive provisions, but also incentive provisions (conditions) of private law contracts.
The basis for the institutional separation of statutory and non-statutory incentive provisions (incentive terms of private law contracts) is primarily the legal regulatory methodology. Its fundamental difference is that the application of civil liability measures and remedies to enforce obligations are examples of so-called negative enforcement, while the implementation of incentives is positive enforcement.
Incentives encourage obligated parties to fulfil their obligations not just properly (statistically normal), i.e. in compliance with only the minimum sufficient requirements, but with the maximum possible effort (most efficiently, quickly, economically in the interests of the legally entitled party to the legal relationship, etc.) When applying incentives to obligated parties to legal relations, such parties make their best efforts at their own discretion, i.e. this element of behaviour is their right, not their obligation.
Another specific feature of the regulatory effect of incentives is that, unlike civil liability and means of ensuring proper fulfilment of obligations, they are not aimed at restoring property or other losses of participants to civil legal relations, since the actual circumstances under which civil law incentives are applied are not related to the need to restore the property or other status of the injured persons.
Downloads
References
Yarema, A. H., Karaban, V. Ya., Kryvenko, V. V., & Rotan, V. H. (2004). Scientific and practical commentary on the civil legislation of Ukraine (Vol. 1). A.S.K.
Spasybo-Fatieieva, I. V. (Ed.). (2020). Civil Code of Ukraine: Scientific and Practical Commentary. Vol. 1: General Provisions. Persons. EKUS.
Krat, V. I., Mytsa, Yu. V. et al. (2020). Civil Code of Ukraine: scientific and practical commentary: explanations, interpretations, recommendations using the positions of the highest judicial instances of Ukraine, scientists, specialists. Vol. 9, part 2: Household contract. Construction contract. Contract for PP, NDR and DKTRZ (I. V. Spasybo-Fatieieva, Ed.). EKUS.
Kossak, V. M. (Ed.). (2008). Scientific and practical commentary on the Civil Code of Ukraine (2nd ed.). Istyna.
Kharytonova, Ye. O., & Kalitenko, O. M. (Eds.). (2023). Civil Code of Ukraine. As of January 1, 2023. Norma prava.
Chalyi, Yu. I. (2024). The concept of civil law incentives. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 4(107), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.32631/v.2024.4.07.
Chalyi, Yu. I. (2025). Incentive norms of civil law of Ukraine: characteristics at an elementary level. In V. M. Vasylenko, Yu. M. Zhornokui, O. L. Zaitsev et al., The Civil Heritage of Aleksandr Anatoliiovych Pushkin (Kharkiv Civil School) (V. V. Sokurenko, Ed.). EKUS.
Chalyi, Yu. I. (2024). Problems of applying incentives in civil law. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 3(106), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.32631/v.2024.3.05.
Skakun, O. F. (2001). Theory of State and Law. Konsum.
Petryshyn, O. V., Pohrebniak, V. S., Smorodynskyi, V. S. et al. (2014). Theory of State and Law (O. V. Petryshyn, Ed.). Pravo.
Adamova, O. S. (2014, May 16–17). Definition of the concept of the institution of law [Conference presentation abstract]. International Scientific Conference “Legal life of modern Ukraine”, Odesa, Ukraine.
Bilozorov, Ye. V., Vlasenko, V. P., Horova, O. B. et al. (2017). Theory of State and Law (S. D. Husariev, & O. D. Tykhomyrov, Eds.). NAIA; Osvita Ukrainy.
Koziubra, M. I. (Ed.). (2015). General theory of law. Vaite.
Tsvik, M. V., Petryshyn, O. V., Avramenko, L. V. et al. (2009). General theory of state and law (M. V. Tsvik, & O. V. Petryshyn, Eds.). Pravo.
Copyright (c) 2025 Yu. I. Chalyi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.