Law-Making Regulated by Law in Ukraine

Keywords: law-making, law-making activity, state, civil society, statism, metamodernism, legisprudence.

Abstract

The article traces the main directions of the transition in theoretical discourse on law-making from the Soviet era to the present day, highlighting the historical and methodological foundations of its development. It demonstrates that as a phenomenon of social reality, law-making plays a fundamental role in the development of society, as it is aimed at the creation and improvement of a general, coherent system of legal norms that regulate social relations and have a binding character.

Given its historical determinism, the article examines the dynamics of perspectives on the theoretical issues of law-making and the presence of political influence in their formation. Attention is drawn to the issue of continuity in scientific knowledge within law-making research. The statist approach to understanding law-making as an exclusively state-driven activity continues to dominate contemporary Ukrainian legal thought and is even more apparent in everyday legal practice. Although current studies emphasize that the law-making process represents a dual, purposeful activity of civil society and authorized law-making bodies, further analysis of the content of law-making focuses solely on the activity of the latter. The article characterizes methodological approaches to the development of law-making ideas.

Attention is also given to the need for a critical rethinking of the positivist approach to the understanding of law-making, which relies solely on formal-dogmatic methods and a scholastic perception of law. It emphasizes the need for an effective, rather than populist, shift toward a natural law methodology and a legal understanding that aligns with the European liberal-democratic model.

The legislative regulation of the process of drafting and adopting normative legal acts in Ukraine has a complex and challenging history, which clearly illustrates the difficulties of the country’s transitional transformation. Accordingly, the study analyzes the emergence of legislative definitions of law-making activity and their impact on the further conceptualization and development of the modern model of this activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

V. Ye. Kyrychenko, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Doctor of Law, Professor.

Department of Theory and History of State and Law (professor).

References

Sinzheimer, H. (1948). Theory of Legislation: The Idea of Evolution in Law. H. D. Willink. New York.

Naschitz, A. M. (1969). Theory and technique in the process of creating law in the light of the Marxist philosophy of law and the legislative practice of the state. Academy of the Socialist Republic of Romania.

Noll, P. (1973). Legislative theory. Rowohlt.

Wintgens, L. J. (1992). Creating a Data Bank in “Legislation”. Legislation Today: Newsletter of the Swiss Society for Legislation, 3, 91–96.

Babii, B. M., Koretskyi, V. M., & Tsvetkova, V. V. (Eds.). (1974). Legal Dictionary. Main editorial office of the Ukrainian Soviet Encyclopaedia of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR.

Babii, B. M., Burchak, F. H., Koretskyi, V. M., & Tsvetkova, V. V. (Eds.). (1983). Legal Dictionary (2nd ed.). Main editorial office of the Ukrainian Soviet Encyclopaedia of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR.

Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. et al. (Eds.). (2003). Legal Encyclopedia (Vol. 5). M. P. Bazhan Ukrainian Encyclopedia.

Kostytskyi, M., & Kushakova-Kostytska, N. (2024). Philosophical Problems of Law-Making. Philosophical and Methodological Problems of Law, 1(27), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.33270/01242702.7.

Kot, O. O., Hryniak, A. B., & Milovska, N. V. (Eds.). (2022). Lawmaking in Ukraine: prospects for legislative regulation. Helvetyka.

Gusarov, S. M. (2015). Concept and essence of law-making in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, 3, 38–46.

Onishchenko, N. M. (2023). Lawmaking: from methodological principles to practical purposes. InterConf, 150, 318–325. https://archive.interconf.center/index.php/conference-proceeding/article/view/2992.

Zaichuk, O. V., & Onishchenko, N. M. (Eds.). (2006). Theory of State and Law. Academic Course. Yurinkom Inter.

Nersesjanc, V. S. (Ed.). (2004). Problems of the general theory of law and state. Norma.

Kuznietsova, N. (2021). Legislation systematization quality assurance as an important lawmaking activity component. Law of Ukraine, 12, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.33498/louu-2021-12-042.

Polenina, S. V. (1985). On the development of the concept of the law on normative acts. Soviet State and Law, 5, 43–50.

Kaz’min, I. F., & Polenina, S. V. (1989). Law on laws: issues of publication and contents. Soviet State and Law, 12, 3–9.

Opryshko, V. (1996). Lawmaking today and tomorrow. Viche, 7, 3–16.

Panov, M. I., & Voronov, M. P. (1995). To the draft Law of Ukraine “On Regulatory Legal Acts”. Journal of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 4, 139–163.

Tkachuk, A., & Naumenko, S. (2005). Legislative process and quality of law: how to achieve harmony? Institute of Civil Society.

Miroshnychenko, A., & Popov, Yu. (2009). Is the Law of Ukraine “On Regulatory and Legal Acts” needed? Forum of Law, 1, 362–372. http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/FP_index.htm_2009_1_51.pdf.

Yushchyk, O. (2005). Law on laws: necessity and concept. University Scientific Notes, 3, 43–48.

Yushchyk, O. (2006). Let’s create a coordinate system to get rid of contradictions. On the problem of legal regulation of legislative activity. Viche, 5, 21–23.

Parkhomenko, N. M. (2024). Strategic planning of lawmaking activities as a factor of post-war reconstruction of Ukraine. Speech at the session of the General Meeting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine on April 24, 2024. Visnyk of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 5, 62–65. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2024.05.062.

Published
2025-07-23
How to Cite
Kyrychenko, V. Y. (2025) “Law-Making Regulated by Law in Ukraine”, Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 109(2), pp. 24-35. doi: 10.32631/v.2025.2.02.
Section
Theory and Philosophy of Law; Comparative Law; History of Law and State