The concept and types of court decisions in civil procedural law

Keywords: judgement, court decision, concept of a court decision, types of court decisions, additional decision, decision in absentia.

Abstract

The article analyses the current legislation of Ukraine and doctrinal approaches to the concept of court decisions. The features of court decisions are revealed. A critical analysis of the definition of the term “decision” is made and recommendations for improvement of current legislation are provided. The study indicates that today there is a rather illogical situation, since the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine defines the term “judgment” in two ways: as a procedural document by which a civil case is resolved on the merits; and as a general concept for all acts of justice adopted by a court in civil proceedings. It is noted that in order to eliminate such terminological inaccuracies, it is necessary to amend the current legislation.

The following types of court decisions are thoroughly analysed: decisions on recognition, decisions on award and transformative (constitutional) decisions. It is noted that award judgments are court decisions confirming the rights, obligations and legitimate interests of the parties, in which one party undertakes to perform certain actions in favour of the other or to refrain from performing them; recognition judgments are court decisions confirming the existence or absence of certain legal relations, circumstances or legal facts between the parties; constitutional judgments are court decisions aimed at creating new legal relations, changing or terminating existing legal relations. The following types of court decisions are analysed: supplementary decision, decision in absentia, full decision and abridged decision. The conclusion is made that studying and analysing the concept and types of court decisions is of great scientific and practical importance, since court decisions stabilise legal relations and ensure real, proper and timely protection of rights and interests protected by law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

O. V. Moroz, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor.

Department of Civil Law and Procedure (associate professor).

References

Perunova, O. M. (2004). Court decision as a procedural document. Bulletin of National University of Internal Affairs, 25, 346–354.

Shymanovych, O. M. (2005). Court rulings in civil proceedings in Ukraine (based on decisions and rulings of the court of first instance) [Candidate dissertation, Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University].

Andronov, I. V. (2018). Court decisions in civil proceedings in Ukraine [Candidate thesis, National University “Odesa Law Academy”].

Shtefan, M. Y. (2001). Civil process. In Yure.

Andronov, I. V. (2012). Judicial decisions in civil proceedings in Ukraine: terminology problems. Current Problems of State and Law, 66, 287–293.

Komarov, V. V. (Ed.). (2001). Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. Odisei.

Shymanovych, O. M. (2003, November 14–15). On the question of types of court decisions in the civil procedural law of Ukraine [Conference presentation abstract]. International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists “Youth in legal science”, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

Luspenyk, D. D. (2005). Application of novelties of the Civil Code and the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine in judicial practice. Kharkiv legal.

Published
2025-04-18
How to Cite
Moroz, O. V. (2025) “The concept and types of court decisions in civil procedural law”, Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 108(1 (Part 1), pp. 99-108. doi: 10.32631/v.2025.1.08.
Section
Civil Law and Civil Procedure; Family Law; International and Legal Direction in