Substantive components of forensic characterisation of interference with the activities of public authorities

V. Yu.  Popov

doi:10.32631/v.2024.3.18

V. Yu. Popov National Scientific Center “Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute” https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9020-9448

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/v.2024.3.18

Keywords: forensic methodology, forensic characteristic, criminal offence, crime, interference with activities, employee of a public authority.

Abstract

The article substantiates the thesis that criminalisation of interference with the activities of public authorities is a natural step towards the development of a democratic and rule-of-law state, and even more so in the current realities of Ukraine's state and legal development. The article emphasises the importance of ensuring the effectiveness of investigation of these criminal offences. It is indicated that the development of practical recommendations for their investigation requires taking into account a number of informative factors, in particular, those which find their external manifestation in the mechanism of criminal activity.

Based on the results of generalisation of the substantive components of the mechanism of interference with the activities of representatives of public authorities (unlawful influence or obstruction of activities), the substantive elements of the criminalistic characterisation of criminal offences of this group are identified. It is proposed to distinguish among them: 1) peculiarities of the situation, time and place of the interference; 2) typical traces of illegal activities aimed at interfering with the victim’s activities – representative of the state authority; 3) methods of interference with the activities of public authorities; 4) characteristic features of the victim of interference with activities – representative of the state authority, information about his/her type of activity, official position, functional responsibilities, information about the immediate supervisor, etc.; 5) information about the identity of the offender, motives and purpose of interference with the victim's activities – representative of the state authority, etc.

The characteristics of each identified element is provided. It is emphasised that the characteristics inherent in each element of the forensic characteristic of interference with the activities of representatives of public authorities, determined on the basis of the analysis of investigative and judicial practice, should be taken into account when developing other elements of the forensic methodology for investigating this group of criminal offences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

V. Yu. Popov, National Scientific Center “Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute”

Candidate of Law,

Doctoral student.

References

Maltseva, A. V. (2023). Social context of establishing criminal liability for interference in the activities of a state official. Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine, 1(19), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.21564/2311-9640.2023.19.279276.

Borovyk, A. V. (2023). Purpose and motives of attacks on government officials. Scientific Notes of Taurida National V. I. Vernadsky University. Series: Juridical Sciences, 34(73), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.32782/TNU-2707-0581/2023.2/20.

Tskhovrebov, A. O. (2017). Criminal liability for interference into law enforcement officer’s activities [Candidate dissertation, Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs].

Kyrbiatiev, O. O. (2021). Criminal legal protection of professional activities of law enforcement officers [Doctoral dissertation, National Academy of Internal Affairs].

Pylypenko, Ye. V. (2018). Interference with activities in the criminal law of Ukraine [Candidate dissertation, Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E. O. Didorenko of the MIA of Ukraine].

Knyzhenko, S. O. (2016). Forensic characteristics of crimes committed by illegal interference in the activities of judicial bodies or illegal influence on participants in the judicial process. Law and Society, 2(1), 196–200.

Husieva, V. O. (2021). Theoretical bases of a methods of investigating crimes against authority of public authorities in terms of law enforcement activity [Doctoral dissertation, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs].

Posashkov, O. O. (2017). Theoretical reconsideration and the formulation of criminalistic characteristics into the role of the ship’s expert. Subcarpathian Law Herald, 1(16), 303–306.

Posashkov, O. O. (2019). The person of the criminal as an element of criminal characteristics of interference in activities forensic expert. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 54(2), 121–124.

Oliynyk, Ya. S. (2021). Methods of Investigating Threats or Violence against a Defense Counselor a Representative of a Person [Doctor of philosophy dissertation, Lviv University of Business and Law].

Rusanivska, D. D. (2023). Investigating interference in the activities of a defense attorney or a person’s representative [Doctor of philosophy dissertation, National Academy of Internal Affairs].

Cherniavskyi, S. S. (2010). Forensic characterization of crimes: comparative analysis of scientific concepts. Scientific Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Internal Affairs, 1, 137–146.

Knyzhenko, S. O. (2021, October 29). Methods of intervention in the activities of judicial bodies [Conference presentation abstract]. International Scientific and Practical Conference “Actual problems of the criminal process and criminology”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Yakovleva, V. S. (2020). Interference in the activities of the judiciary in Ukraine: an assessment of the current situation. Issues of Crime Prevention, 40, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.31359/2079-6242-2020-40-126.