Theoretical approaches to improving the terminological apparatus of psychodiagnostic research in the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine
Abstract
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the basic concepts and terms used in the field of psychological diagnostics. The scientific approaches to the formation of terms and conceptual apparatus by which this branch of psychological science describes its subject of study are considered. It is emphasised that the development of science is determined primarily by the formation of terminology, that is, its language as a system of general and specific concepts that are reflected in certain terms and signs. It is stated that the language of psychodiagnostics is a complex, multilevel, integral system, the elements of which are categories, concepts, terms, symbols. It is shown that in the course of the development of psychology, the conceptual apparatus is continuously being improved, definitions are being clarified, and the terminological vocabulary is being enriched. The current state of development of psychodiagnostics, the formation of promising theories of assessment and measurement of individual characteristics have necessitated the clarification of its terminological apparatus, a significant number of concepts, definitions, which are often contradictory, through the use of various approaches and terminological elements. It is emphasised that the conceptual and terminological apparatus of psychodiagnostics should be developed on the basis of modern realities, abandoning outdated approaches to the definition of certain concepts, and that work towards clarifying and unifying terms requires special care and validity.
With a view to improving the terminology, the author provides clarifications of some common definitions. Thus, it is proposed to distinguish between the concepts of “qualities” and “traits”, since “quality” corresponds to the Kettellian term “superficial” or “primary” trait and the Allportian term “secondary” or “secondary” disposition, and the concept of “trait” is more generalised, it summarises the existence of a significant number of qualities. It is proposed to understand individual (individual psychological) properties as generalised characteristics of temperament, character, abilities, orientation, i.e. stable mental phenomena which influence human activity, characterise a personality from the psychological and social aspects and are implemented in society. In addition, it is proposed to clearly distinguish between the concepts of “qualities”, “traits”, “features”, to introduce the terms “individual and personal properties and traits”, and to differentiate psychodiagnostic tools for the study of constitutional, individual and personal traits.
Downloads
References
Barko, V. V. (2023). Theory and practice of psychological study of personnel of the National Police of Ukraine. Fact.
Burlachuk, L. Ph. (2007). Dictionary-handbook on psychodiagnostics. Piter.
Barko, V. І. (2002). Professional selection of personnel to the internal affairs bodies (psychological aspect). Nika-Centre.
Ilin, Е. P. (2011). Work and personality. Workaholism, perfectionism, laziness. Piter.
Maksymenko, S. D. (2006). The genesis of the exercise of personality. KMM LLC.
Hornostai, P., & Tytarenko, T. (Eds.). (2001). Psychology of personality. Ruta.
Allport, G. W. (1967). Pattern and growth in personality. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Allport, G. W. (1981). Personality and Social encounter. University of Chicago Press.
Barko, V. I., Barko, V. V., Ostapovich, V. P., & Protsyk, L. S. (2019). The ways of improving the professional selection of personnel of the National Police of Ukraine (psychological and legal aspect). Science and Education a New Dimension. Pedagogy and Psychology, VII(76), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.31174/SEND-PP2019-187VII76-17.
Ostapovich, V., Barko, V., Okhrimenko, I., Yevdokimova, O., Ponomarenko, Ya., Prontenko, K., Antonova, O., Sydorchuk, N., & Sokolovskyi, O. (2020). Psychological Profile of Successful Criminal Police Officer. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 9(3), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.26655/IJAEP.2020.3.27.
Cattell, R. B. (1970). The scientific analysis of personality. Penguin Books.
Cattell, R. B. (1977). The inheritance of personality and ability: Research methods. Academic Press.
Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its Structure, Growth and Action. North-Holland.
Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, H. E. (1995). Personality structure and the new fifth edition of the 16PF. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(6), 926–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055006002.
Eysenck, H. J. (1982). Personality, genetics, and behavior: Selected Papers. Praeger.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. Plenum Press.
Chibnall, J. T., Detrick, P., & Luebbert, M. C. (2005). Validity Study: Relationship between Personality and Academy Performance. Applied HRM Research, 10(2), 99–102.
Dunnette, M. D., & Borman, W. C. (1979). Personnel Selection and Classification Systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 477–525. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.002401.
Horn, J. M., Loehlin, I. C., & Williman, L. (1982). Aspects of inheritance of intellectual abilities. Behavior Genetics, 12, 470–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073781.
Pervin, L. A., & John, O. P. (2001). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. Guilford Press.
Salgado, F. J., Moscoso, S., Fruyt, F., Anderson, N., Bertua, C., & Rolland, J. P. (2003). A Meta-Analytic Study of General Cognitive Ability Validity for Different Occupations in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1068–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1068.
Copyright (c) 2024 V. I. Barko, V. V. Barko, O. O. Yevdokimova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
