Legal measures to ensure fair distribution of income for sustainable development of Ukraine
Abstract
The article examines the relationship between income distribution and the socio-economic development of the state. It is established that traditional methods of income distribution do not provide for sustainable development and do not correspond to the Constitution of Ukraine, which declares Ukraine a social state. The main regulator of income distribution is the Tax Code. Unfortunately, the current Tax Code of Ukraine does not at all provide for a fair redistribution of income and does not stimulate investment in the production sectors, but encourages the creation of various corruption schemes for evasion and avoidance of taxation, which includes a large-scale shadow economy, illegal export of capital, contraband imports and exports. The article proposes legal methods for overcoming all problems and ensuring accelerated development. To achieve these goals, legislation should contain an comprehensive list of price components. The fair market value (price) is equal to the total added value of the product or service, VAT charged on it and total depreciation at all stages of production and distribution. Added value is the sum of the company's factor incomes: wages and profits. The amount of actually paid taxes from the labor and profit fund determines the actually created added value, on which VAT is calculated, which is paid directly to the Budget at each stage of the movement of goods/services to the final consumer. The amount of added value, VAT and depreciation determines the increase in the market value of goods/services at each stage of production and distribution and corresponds to the amount of taxes, contributions and fees paid precisely by law. The distribution of income in society is determined on the basis of the European Social Charter (revised) and is ensured by the introduction of progressive tax rates on the incomes of individuals and the profits of enterprises. The income tax rate should be determined by the direction of use of profits, and the rate of distributed profit on dividends should be equal to the personal income tax rates. The zero rate does not apply to taxation of dividends.
Downloads
References
Sulafa, N. (2021). An Assessment of the Debates over Income Distribution and Growth in the Neo-Kaleckian Literature. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 41(4), 782–796. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572021-3165.
Ricardo, D. (2001). Principles of political economy and taxation. Batoche Books.
Mazur, M., & Sirenko, K. (2023). Labor market in the countries of the European Union: statistical aspect. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 26, 80–83. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3583/26.12.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). Inequality and economic growth. Rethinking Capitalism, 86(1), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12237.
Lavoie, M., & Stockhammer, E. (2012). Wage-led growth: Concept, theories and policies [Conference presentation abstract]. Regulating for Decent Work (RDW) Conference, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kohler, K., Guschanski, A., & Stockhammer, E. (2019). The impact of financialisation on the wage share: a theoretical clarification and empirical test. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(4), 937–974.
Stockhammer, E. (2015). Rising inequality as a cause of the present crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(3), 935–958.
Oreiro, J. L. (2018). Post-Keynesian macrodynamics: growth and income distribution. Alta Books.
Pyroha, I. S. (2018). Single tariff grid: the purpose of social policy. Journal of the South Regional Center of National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 14, 65–73.
Baccaro, L., & Pontusson, J. (2016). Rethinking Comparative Political Economy: The Growth Model Perspective. Politics & Society, 44(2), 175–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329216638053.
Copyright (c) 2024 S. S. Pyroha
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.