Genesis of national legislation and scientific thought development regarding criminal liability for perjury
Abstract
One of the ways to mislead a court or other authorised body is to provide deliberately false testimony by a witness or victim, for which the legislator provides for criminal liability in Article 384 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Based on the social danger of this criminal offence, which is an encroachment on the lawful procedure for the administration of justice, in particular, ensuring the rule of law, legality in the procedural activities of courts, law enforcement agencies, and other institutions entrusted with the enforcement of court decisions, the importance of ensuring a high-quality investigation of these criminal offences has been emphasised. The purpose of the study is defined as clarification and generalisation of theoretical concepts of the emergence and historical development of the peculiarities of criminal liability for knowingly false testimony of a witness and a victim, and outlining the areas for improvement of modern scientific knowledge on this issue.
The article analyses certain aspects of the development of national legislation on criminal liability for perjury of a witness and a victim. The author summarises the theoretical developments of scholars whose research focused on the issues of criminal liability for committing criminal offences of this type, as well as the procedural features of obtaining witness and victim testimony, and the specifics of their verification and evaluation. Given the above, the article assesses the development of scientific thought in this regard, and outlines the prospects for further research in the context of determining the grounds and specific features of criminal prosecution of persons who have induced or forced a witness and a victim to give false testimony. The author describes the current state of scientific support for the organisational and tactical principles of investigation of criminal offences of this type, as well as the procedural aspects of obtaining testimony, its verification and evaluation.
Downloads
References
Paliukh, L. M. (2021). Criminal Liability for Criminal Offenses against Justice [Doctoral thesis, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs].
Tatsii, V. Ya., Pshonka, V. P., & Portnov, A. V. (Eds). (2012). Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Scientific and practical commentary (Vol. 2). Right.
Zdorovko, S. F. (2013). Comparative analysis of criminal legal regulations on liability of deliberately false evidence in Ukraine and modern states of Europe, America, Asia and Australia. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: International Relations. Economics. Country Studies. Tourism, 1086, 50–57
Davydovych, I. I. (2019). Perjury and falsification of evidence under US and Ukrainian criminal law (comparative legal aspect). Analytical and Comparative Law, 6, 387–391.
Shepitko, M. V. (2012). Criminal liability for knowingly false testimony. Apostille.
Shepitko, М. V. (2018). Theoretical and methodological foundation of counteraction to crimes against justice as a forming system [Doctoral thesis, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University].
Melnichenko, M. I. (2016). Criminal law protection of the order of obtaining evidence in criminal proceedings [Cfndidate dissertation, Koretsky Institute of State and Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine].
Nikitenko, V. M. (2018). Falsification of Evidence under National Criminal Law [Candidate dissertation, Koretsky Institute of State and Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine].
Opanasenko, V. I. (2019). Criminal responsibility for falsification of evidence: the features of regulation and ways to improve [Candidate dissertation, Тaras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv].
Alieksieieva, N. Yu. (2017). Criminal liability for crimes against justice committed by or in relation to witnesses, experts, translators [Candidate dissertation, Koretsky Institute of State and Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine].
Hlomb, Yu. O. (2023). Criminal Liability for Misleading the Court or other authorized body [Candidate dissertation, Koretsky Institute of State and Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine].
Stakhovskii, S. N. (1996). Witness testimony as a source of evidence in criminal proceedings [Candidate thesis, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine].
Pereverza, O. Ya. (2000). Forming of false testimony, the system of tactics means, finding out and their overcoming [Candidate thesis, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law Academy of Ukraine].
Zaiats, D. D. (2005). Situational approach to tactics of checking out of testimony at the crime scene [Candidate thesis, National University of Internal Affairs].
Nehrebetskyi, V. V. (2005). Verifying Testimony at the Crime Scene: Tactics and Psychology [Candidate thesis, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law Academy of Ukraine].
Kolesnyk, I. А. (2010). Tactics to identify and neutralize bona fide errors in witness statements [Candidate thesis, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law Academy of Ukraine].
Lovkin, V. L. (2006). The affidavit of the accused person in the criminal process of Ukraine [Candidate thesis, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv].
Ostriichuk, O. P. (2013). Testimony of the accused as separate procedural sources of evidence in criminal proceedings. Current Problems of State and Law, 70, 321–327.
Lushpiienko, V. M. (2018). Witness’s testimony as a procedural source of evidence in the criminal procedure in Ukraine [Candidate thesis, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv].
Novikova, N. A. (2018). Evidence of witnesses in the civil process [Candidate dissertation, The Academician F. H. Burchak Scientific-Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship of National Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine].
Solonova, O. O. (2018). Victim’s testament as a source of evidence in criminal process [Candidate thesis, National Academy of Internal Affairs].
Copyright (c) 2023 K. А. Romanauskas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
