Limits of competence of a forensic commodity expert in determining the characteristics of goods in cases of customs rules violation

Keywords: classification of goods, characteristics, UCC FEA code, forensic commodity examination, customs clearance.

Abstract

Today, all goods, regardless of the country of origin, are subject to classification, that is, codes are determined for goods in accordance with the classification groupings specified in the UCC of the Economic and Monetary Union. Expertise on determining the conformity of the characteristics of goods according to the UCC FEA, regardless of the purpose of establishing the code, is only a means of establishing the circumstances of implementation, that is, the characteristics on which the definition of the goods code is based, but by its task it cannot support the adoption of a decision on the determination interpretation of the product code according to the UCC FEA. Understanding the correctness of drawing up an expert's opinion allows to avoid difficulties when conducting a forensic commodity examination.

The classification of goods is carried out in accordance with the requirements of the UCC FEA and is a technique that allows to present the classified goods in the form of a group of signs (product code) established by this classifier. When conducting a forensic commodity expert examination, a commodity expert may not exceed his or her powers and go beyond his or her competence when answering questions about determining the characteristics of the object of research according to the code of the UCC FEA. In the course of a commodity examination, a commodity expert determines only the characteristics of the goods, and the UCC FEA code is not determined.

The article clarifies the peculiarities of determining the UCC FEA code, explains from a practical point of view what is the work of a forensic expert in conducting this type of forensic commodity examination. The article provides recommendations for forensic institutions on how to resolve the issues raised by forensic commodity expertise and the correctness of drawing up an expert's opinion, since this allows avoiding difficulties in conducting forensic commodity expertise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

S. О. Diachuk, Kharkiv Research Institute Expert Forensic Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine

Department of Commodity and Gemological Research (chief forensic expert).

References

Kostyrkina, N. F., & Martosenko, M. H. (2019, November 27–28). Possibilities of forensic commodity examination when determining the characteristics of goods in accordance with the requirements of UKTZED [Conference presentation abstract]. І International Scientific and Practical Conference “Current issues of expert and evaluation activities”, Starobilsk – Poltava, Ukraine.

Stashevska, I. V., & Petrenko, I. S. (2021). Conducting commodity expert examinations to determine product codes in accordance with UCT ZED by state or public institutions. Forensic Herald, 2(36), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.37025/1992-4437/2021-36-2-104.

Morozova, M. M. (2018, November 27–28). Problems of the procedure of coding and classification of goods for the purpose of their customs clearance in accordance with UKTZED [Conference presentation abstract]. I International Scientific and Practical Internet Conference “Entrepreneurship, trade: theoretical approaches and practical aspects of development”, Starobilsk, Ukraine.

Bakun, L. P. (2019, April 4–5). Classification work and identification problems as a product examination tool [Conference presentation abstract]. VI International Scientific and Practical Internet Conference “Actual problems of the theory and practice of goods examination”, Poltava, Ukraine.

Published
2023-10-04
How to Cite
DiachukS. О. (2023) “Limits of competence of a forensic commodity expert in determining the characteristics of goods in cases of customs rules violation”, Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 102(3 (Part 2), pp. 180-186. doi: 10.32631/v.2023.3.40.
Section
Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics; Forensic Examination; OSA