The language of law as a unique direction of human communication (theoretical legal and philosophical reflections)
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of the language of law as a special direction of human communication. It has been noted that in the modern world, the connection between law and language appears at a sufficiently deep level and is a sufficiently complex and fundamental expression of their interaction. The research draws attention to the similarities and differences inherent in linguistics and jurisprudence.
Attention has been focused on the fact that legal language is usually perceived somewhat specifically by ordinary citizens and society as a whole, as it looks specialized, elevated and technical, especially its written form. This is, in particular, due to the fact that constructions containing legal terminology, specialized legal terms, legal vocabulary are used to write a legal text, which leads to the fact that the language of law becomes incomprehensible to non-lawyers. Attention has been drawn to the peculiarities of the use of legal linguistics in the Anglo-Saxon law systems and in German-speaking countries.
The approaches of researchers advocating for the simplification of the language of law have been considered, since, in their opinion, the language of law as a certain means of communication is characterized by “grandiloquence and verbosity”, which makes it difficult for the average citizen to understand it and does not allow them to fully familiarize themselves with normative documents and court decisions.
The study also has raised the issue of gender equality when using the language of law in the modern world. Attention has been drawn to the fact that in foreign political and legal opinion, the statement is gaining more and more strength that if the goal of the law is really unlimited access of citizens to their constitutional rights to information and non-degradation of any gender, then the simplification of legal communication and gender-neutral writing should be its main goal.
Downloads
References
Wittgenstein L., 2003. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Tagebücher 1914–1916. Philosophische Untersuchungen. 15th ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Ed.: Schulte J.).
Vogel F., Hamann H. and Gauer I., 2018. Computer-Assisted Legal Linguistics: Corpus Analysis as a New Tool for Legal Studies. Law & Social Inquiry, No. 43, pp. 1340-1363. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12305.
Galdia M., 2009. Legal Linguistics. Frankfurt am Main.
Crystal D. and Davy D., 1969. Investigating English style. Berlin: Longman.
Mellinkoff D., 1963. The Language of the Law. Missouri: Little Brown & Co.’s.
Williams C., 2005. Traditions and change in legal English. Bern: Peter Lang.
Williams C., 2011. Legal English and plain language: an update. ESP Across Cultures, No. 11, рр. 139-151.
Williams C., 2015. Changing with the times: the evolution of plain language in the legal sphere. Alicante Journal of English Studies, No. 28, рр. 183-200.
Mautner G., 2012. Language, space and the law: a study of directive signs. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, Vol. 19, No. 2, рр. 189-217. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v19i2.189.
Hamann Н. and Vogel А., 2017. Evidence-Based Jurisprudence Meets Legal Linguistics – Unlikely Blends Made in Germany. BYU Law Review, [online] Iss. 6. рр. 1473-1502. Available at https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2017/iss6/8/ [Accessed 12 August 2022].
Namakula C.S., 2012. Language rights in the minimum guarantees of fair criminal trial. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, Vol. 19, Iss. 1, рр. 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1558/IJSLL.V19I1.73.
Gibbons J., 2013. Language in legal contexts: The “why” question. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, Vol. 2, No. 1, рр. 39-41. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v2i1.39.
Hafner C.A., 2009. Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating an Online Resource for Professional Legal Communication Skills. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, Vol. 16, No. 2, рр. 299-302. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v16i2.299.
Dietrich В., 1992. Textinterpretation: Sprachtheoretische Grundlagen einer Explikativen Semantik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Bernd J., 1998. Die neuere Fachsprache der juristischen Wissenschaft seit der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Verfassungsrecht und Rechtsmethodik. In: Hoffmann L., Kalverkämper H., Wiegand H.E. (Hgg.), Fachsprachen. Berlin; New York. S. 1286-1295.
Tiersma P., 1999. Legal Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Adler M., 2012. The Plain Language Movement. Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, No. 40, рр. 67-83.
Aprill E., 1998. The Law of the Word: Dictionary Shopping in the Supreme Court. Arizona State Law Journal, No. 30, рр. 275-336.
Balkin J. and Levinson S., 1996. How to Win Cites and Influence People. Chicago-Kent Law Review, No. 71, рр. 843-869.
Austin A., 1993. The Reliability of Citation Counts in Judgments on Promotion, Tenure and Status. Arizona Law Review, No. 35, рр. 829-840.
Hörmann H., 1980. Der Vorgang des Verstehens. Sprache und Verstehen, Nr. 130, s. 17-29.
Gumperz J., 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sanni O., 2022. A review of legal language: A new direction for legal communication. Academia Letters, [online] Iss. 16. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL5746.
Mattila H.E.S., 2006. Comparative legal linguistics. Hampshire.
Waters S., 1997. Legal English: One register or several genres? Revue Belge de Philologieet d’Histoire, No. 75, рр. 805-820.
Goodrich P., 1984. Law and language: an historical and critical introduction. Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 11, No. 2, рр. 173-206.
Mellinkoff R.L., 1964. The Language of the Law. Michigan Law Review, No. 63, pp. 180-186.
Gozdz-Roszkowski S., 2012. Legal language. [online] Wiley Online Library. Available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0678 [Accessed 12 August 2022].
Ezeifeka C.R. and Osakwe N.N., 2013. Gender representation in the 1999 Nigerian consti-tution: A critical discourse analysis for socio-political equity. Discourse & Society, Vol. 24, Iss. 6, рр. 687-700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486221.
Copyright (c) 2022 V. V. Lazariev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
