Problems of the conceptual and terminological apparatus of the procedure for initiating forensic examination in criminal proceedings

Keywords: criminal proceedings, forensic examination, investigative (research) action, conducting an expertise, appointment of expertise, order of expertise.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the formulation of a stable conceptual and terminological apparatus of the procedure for initiating a forensic examination in criminal proceedings. The provisions of the current criminal procedural legislation regarding the procedures for initiating forensic examinations have been analyzed. It has been found that the specified procedures have at least nine different legally established names, which contradicts the requirements of the principle of legal certainty and may lead to confusion in practice.

The artocle argues that the term “conducting an expertise” should refer exclusively to a forensic examination within the meaning of Art. 1 of the Law of Ukraine “On Forensic Expertise” and does not include the activity of the subjects of evidence regarding the initiation of such an examination or evaluation of the conclusion based on its results. The content of the wordings “appointment of expertise” and “order of expertise” has been considered in detail. It is emphasized that the first of them should be applied to the cases of initiation of the examination by the prosecution, the investigating judge and the court, while the second – to the procedures of initiation of the forensic examination by other entities on a contractual basis. The incorrectness of the wordings “engagement of an expert”, “assignment (for) conducting an examination” is indicated due to the traditional use of the words “engage” and “assign” in criminal proceedings in a different context. It is proposed to bring the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine on the initiation of forensic examinations into a single system of concepts, and to bring other legal acts into compliance with the specified Code.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

A. V. Kovalenko, Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor,

Scientific and Research Laboratory of Public

Safety of Communities of Faculty № 2 (senior researcher).

References

Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2016). Complex forensic expert research: theory and practice. Right.

Tymchyshyn, A. M. (2023). Special knowledge in the criminal process of Ukraine. Yurydyka.

Shcherbakovskyi, M. H. (2015). Conducting and using forensic examinations in criminal proceedings. In business.

Bazhanyuk, V. V. (2022). On the adversarial of the parties in conducting a judicial examination. Law Journal of Donbass, 1(78), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.32366/2523-4269-2022-78-1-139-145.

Hora, I. V. (2013). Problems of using special knowledge in the criminal justice system of Ukraine. Legal Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 1, 209–214.

Zhuravel, V. A., Konovalova, V. E., & Avdeyeva, G. K. (2021). Reliability evaluation of a forensic expert’s opinion: World practices and Ukrainian realities. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(2), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.37635/jnalsu.28(2).2021.252-261.

Hloviuk, I. & Torbas, O. (2018). New procedure for engaging an expert under the criminal procedural code of Ukraine: gains and miscalculations. Bulletin of the National Academy of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine, 2(54), 97–108.

Kovalenko, V. (2023). Some problems of appointment of expertise by the defense in Criminal Justice of Ukraine. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights, 1, 107–112. https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2023.1.15.

Pyrih, I. V. (2019). To the question of accessories of forensic examination to investigative actions. Criminalistics and Forensics, 64, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2019.64.03.

Tsyhaniuk, Yu. V., Kravchuk, O. V., & Krushynskyi, S. A. (2014). Procedural for involvement of an expert by the defense in criminal proceedings. Forensic Herald, 2(22), 28–36.

Riashko, O. V. (2020). Criminal proceedings regarding the application of coercive measures of a medical nature: appointment of a psychiatric examination and peculiarities of the subject of proof. In T. Borowiak, A. Wrobel, T. O. Kolomoiets (Eds), Modern achievements of EU countries and Ukraine in the area of law (pp. 534–547). Baltija Publishing.

Busel, V. T. (Ed.). (2005). Great Explanatory Dictionary of Modern Ukrainian Language. Perun.

Published
2024-03-29
How to Cite
Kovalenko, A. V. (2024) “Problems of the conceptual and terminological apparatus of the procedure for initiating forensic examination in criminal proceedings”, Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 104(1 (Part 1), pp. 176-187. doi: 10.32631/v.2024.1.15.
Section
Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics; Forensic Examination; OSA