Agreement on the termination of obligation by transferring indemnity: content and special features

Keywords: indemnity, agreement, termination of a civil obligation, transfer of the subject of indemnity.

Abstract

In order to ensure stable law enforcement, it is important to have a correct interpretation of the functions of the institution of indemnity and unified approaches to the implementation of the mechanism for concluding and executing an agreement on the transfer of indemnity. The legal nature of the transfer of indemnity, its special properties and significance in the construction of termination of an obligation by indemnity have been investigated. It has been emphasized that the function of the indemnity agreement is to record the parties’ agreement to terminate the principal obligation in this way, as well as explained the peculiarity of the indemnity agreement as a combination of the features of the law-establishing and law-terminating legal fact, since the agreement both gives rise to additional rights and obligations for the parties and serves to terminate the original obligation as a result of its execution i.e. transfer of the indemnity by the debtor to the creditor.

It has been suggested that it is the content of the agreement between the creditor and the debtor on the transfer of the indemnity, which is concluded in compliance with the requirements of current legislation, that allows distinguishing the indemnity from related institutions of law of obligations, and determining the nature of legal relations between the parties in case of disputes. For example, debt forgiveness is a law-terminating legal fact presented in the form of a transaction that does not create an obligation between the creditor and the debtor, and novation, unlike indemnity, does not provide for the termination of the binding relationship between the parties, but rather the preservation of such a relationship in a modified form.

Attention has also been drawn to the inadmissibility of entering into an agreement on indemnity by third parties who are not parties to the original obligation. Thus, the mechanism of termination of an obligation by indemnity is based solely on the will of the parties and their mutual agreement on all essential terms of indemnity transfer, which excludes any form of participation of a third party in the decision to terminate the obligation between the creditor and the debtor in this way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

V. V. Rasskazova , Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Department of Civil Law and Procedure (senior lecturer).

References

Shymko F.A., 2016. Debt forgiveness as a way to terminate obligations [Proshсhennia borhu yak sposib prypynennia zoboviazan]. Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation. Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs.

Padun Ye.V., 2013. Criteria for demarcating a derogatory from a novation in the civil law of Ukraine [Kryterii vidmezhuvannia vidstupnoho vid novatsii v tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy]. Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav – Scientific Herald of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, No. 3, pp. 91-97.

Puchkovska I. Y., 2007. About the use of a deposit as a discount [Pro vykorystannia zavdatku yak vidstupnoho]. Deržavne budìvnictvo ta mìsceve samovrâduvannâ, Iss. 13, pp. 96-104.

Cherkashyn S.V., 2020. Deposit is the form of liability or retreat? [Zavdatok: forma vidpovidalnosti chy vidstupne?]. Pravo ì suspìlʹstvo – Law and Society, No. 1, pp. 181-186. https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736/2020.1-1.27.

Published
2023-07-02
How to Cite
Rasskazova , V. V. (2023) “Agreement on the termination of obligation by transferring indemnity: content and special features”, Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 101(2 (Part 1), pp. 43-51. doi: 10.32631/v.2023.2.04.
Section
Civil Law and Civil Procedure; Family Law; International and Legal Direction in