Administrative and legal regulation of the limits for preventing and combating corruption in the public service

Keywords: corruption, limits for preventing and countering corruption, public service, legislation, state policy, legal regulation, classification, problematic aspects, directions for improvement.

Abstract

The article states that the fight against corruption in the public service requires the regulatory and legal consolidation and organizational implementation of the limits for preventing corruption, by which we understand the actual definition of anti-corruption activities in laws and subordinate legal acts, as well as the existence at the organizational and institutional level of regulatory mechanisms the impact of social relations that arise in the course of the work of anti-corruption and law enforcement agencies in the field of preventing and countering corruption.

The Law of Ukraine “On Corruption Prevention”, the Criminal Code of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine “On Civil Service”, the Law of Ukraine “On the National Anti-Corruption Bureau”, the Law of Ukraine “On the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office” are the main legislative acts regulating the issues of preventing and combating corruption.

Based on the essence and normative and legal grounds of the limits for preventing and combating corruption, we conditionally divide the latter into normative and legal, institutional, which provide for the existence and effective functioning of specially authorised entities responsible for preventing and combating corruption, moral and ethical limits.

Problematic aspects of the limits for preventing and countering corruption in the public service include the lack of effective mechanisms for public control over the declarations of officials under martial law, insufficient coordination between law enforcement agencies in the course of preventing and countering corruption, and the interference of political forces in the process of formation and further functioning of anti-corruption bodies.

Through the prism of the USA’s experience detailed study and the views of domestic administrative scientists, separate areas of improvement of the administrative and legal regulation of the limits for prevention and counteraction corruption in the public service have been formed, in particular, the formation of an effective system of separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial branches, ensuring at the constitutional level guarantees of basic rights and freedoms, the development of an appropriate institutional structure, the effectiveness of legislative mechanisms of control (supervision).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

E. O. Muzychuk, Academy of Labor, Social Relations and Tourism

Postgraduate student.

References

Hvozdetskyi, V. D. (2019, October 17). Legal principles of preventing and countering corruption in Ukraine [Conference presentation abstract]. Scientific and Practical Conference “Peculiarities of application of anti-corruption legislation: from investigation to court verdict”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Ruvin, O. H. (2021). Administrative and legal principles of control over the activity of forensic expert institutions of Ukraine [Doctoral dissertation, Sumy State University].

Kyriukha, K. I. (2022). Administrative and legal regulation of corruption prevention in the bodies of the National Police of Ukraine [Candidate dissertation, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs].

Kisil, Z. R. (2012). The current state of administrative and legal understanding of corruption, its social essence as an object of influence of the law enforcement system. Scientific Bulletin of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, 1, 144–153.

Korystin, O. Ye., & Pospolitak, A. I. (2014). General approaches to the definition of corruption crimes in the field of official and professional activity of public officials. Law and Society, 2, 170–176.

Miftakhudinov, V. (2017). Criminal liability for corruption offenses. Legal Newspaper, 25(575), 17–21.

Kalenychenko, T., Kyselova, T., Kopina, A. et al. (2021). Conflict management for public service needs (D. Protsenko, Ed.). Vaite.

Kurko, N. M. (2016). Administrative and legal regulation of anti-corruption activities of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine [Candidate thesis, Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs].

Vandin, Ye. V. (2017). Organizational and legal principles of the activity of the Specialized Anti-corruption Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine [Candidate dissertation, National University “Odesa Law academy”].

Marushchak, A. I. (2016). Administrative liability for offenses in the field of citizens’ access to information as a means of fighting corruption. Combating Organized Crime and Corruption (Theory and Practice), 14, 40–45.

Busol, O. Yu. (2015). Anti-corruption crime in Ukraine in the context of modern anti-corruption strategy [Doctoral thesis, Koretsky Institute of State and Law of National Academy of Science of Ukraine].

Kozynets, O., & Prorochenko, V. (2020). Formation and development of the theory of separation of powers in the history of world political and legal thought. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 1, 165–169. https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.1.30.

Fedoriv, U. (2015). American concepts of parliamentarism. Newsletter Precarpathian University. Political science, 9, 94–102.

Published
2023-10-04
How to Cite
Muzychuk, E. O. (2023) “Administrative and legal regulation of the limits for preventing and combating corruption in the public service”, Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 102(3 (Part 2), pp. 106-113. doi: 10.32631/v.2023.3.33.
Section
Administrative Law and Procedure; Financial Law